All Interviews

John Updike, whose provocative 22nd novel, Terrorist, tells the story of an 18-year-old, New Jersey-born suicide bomber, attributes his remarkable productivity to the way he has arranged his life. "Out of habit as well as compulsion" he shows up at his office around 9 a.m. ("or a little before, actually, now that I'm getting older and wake up earlier"). He tries to write a thousand words a day. He "bolts through to the end of a draft" then "looks at it with a cool eye."

"I try to structure my life so it isn't too exciting in itself. It's not a big-city life," Updike says during a call to his home in Beverly Farms, Massachusetts, a small industrial town across the river from Salem. Updike and his second wife have lived there for 24 years.

"I find small towns – maybe because I was born in one – handier. The bank, the post office, the fruit and vegetable store, the liquor store, all those things are within an easy walk in this village. That's not true in a city."

On September 11, 2001, however, Updike had a catastrophic big-city moment. On a visit to his wife's son in Brooklyn, he watched the burning and collapse of the World Trade Center towers. "It gave me a sense that I was in a very minor way a witness to whatever we're engaged in now. Bush calls it the war on terror, as if terror can ever be overcome. And as a novel like The Coup [1978] shows, I'm interested in Islam as a more fiery and absolutist and, some would say, fanatical brand of theistic faith. So it was not just my happening to have been there but my sensation that I was qualified to speak about why young men are willing to become suicide bombers. I can kind of understand it, and I'm not sure too many Americans can."

Updike's terrorist is Ahmad Ashmawy Mulloy, son of an Irish-American mother and an Egyptian father who abandoned the family before Ahmad can remember. Ahmad grows up in the hopeless inner city of New Prospect, New Jersey, a wondrously described fictional town across the Hudson from New York. Seeking some connection with his father and some sense of stability, Ahmad begins attending a storefront mosque and falls under the sway of Shaikh Rashid, then becomes, in a way, a more perfect believer than his teacher. "To Ahmad the words of the Koran are sacred. They're alive. They're fire," Updike says. "I thought it was important to show how much Ahmad needed to make his own philosophy, as it were, because the environment wasn't coming up with any."

Ironically, in many ways Ahmad is an ideal kid. "He's what we're all trying to raise, this really nice, upright boy, full of faith and seriousness," Updike says wryly. "As Jack Levy keeps telling him, you're really the model kid except that you're trying to kill us all."

Jack Levy is the other central figure in Updike's narrative. A non-observant Jew and a world-weary high school guidance counselor on the brink of retirement, he takes an interest – a little too late as it turns out – in Ahmad. "There's a lot I don't know about how America conducts its business," Updike says, "but being a schoolteacher's son, I do have a feeling for high school teachers and that sort of weariness that comes from 30 years of counseling kids who don't seem to be any better for it while at the same time there's that do-good streak of somehow wanting to save somebody from a fall."

The climactic moment of Terrorist brings these two figures together in a desperate confrontation, which Updike says was the driving vision of the book. He is understandably reluctant to discuss this key scene for fear of spoiling the suspense.

One of the most honored writers of his generation and a two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, Updike tells his story with the thrilling, gorgeous prose we have come to expect of him. There is, for example, a terrible beauty in his description of the lake of rubble in the hollowed-out core of downtown New Prospect. And there is a ravishing sermon at a Black Christian church that Ahmad attends at the invitation of his seductive classmate Joryleen. "You're working partly out of your subconscious," Updike says of this scene. "Any work of art, including a piece of fiction, that you're working on month after month is somewhat out of control. You're at the mercy of what turns you on, and obviously that Black sermon turned me on."

Updike has often explored themes of religious faith and disillusionment. In Terrorist, he links those themes to the legacy of fanatical violence. "It's about an America now in which you can't get into a federal building without being checked for a gun, where boarding a plane has become an ordeal in a way it never used to be. Every day we – especially people who try to move around – feel the tensions in what used to be our freedom. We feel all these very real effects that Mohamed Atta and his colleagues created."

And yet Updike portrays Ahmad with empathy. "I think there are enough people complaining about the Arab menace that I can be allowed to try to show this young man as sympathetically as I can," Updike says. "He's my hero. I tried to understand him and to dramatize his world. Besides it's not just young Muslims who are killing themselves. We have all these American high school students, steeped in Protestantism and Judaism, who bring guns to school and shoot up the cafeteria knowing they're going to die at the end of this rush. There are a lot of teenagers who are going to take big chances."

In novels like Terrorist, John Updike himself, now in his mid-70s, also takes big chances. "I've not become jaded about writing," he says. "That still seems somehow very worth doing. I don't quite know why it is worthy in an age that is groaning under the weight of unread or little-read books. But just to conjure up things out of your head and turn them into black marks on paper is a great privilege and remains very exciting to me."

Alden Mudge is a juror for the California Book Awards.

 

John Updike, whose provocative 22nd novel, Terrorist, tells the story of an 18-year-old, New Jersey-born suicide bomber, attributes his remarkable productivity to the way he has arranged his life. "Out of habit as well as compulsion" he shows up at his office around 9…

"You didn’t ask the question everybody else seems to be asking," Monica Ali says at the end of our conversation about her second novel, Alentejo Blue. In less than a minute, Ali must leave her home outside London to fetch her son and daughter, ages seven and five, from school. Ali’s writing day is defined by her children’s school schedule, but today the school has agreed to keep them an hour longer so she can take a call from BookPage.

"Everybody wants to know after the big success of the first book, how I feel about the second book coming out," Ali continues. " I hate being asked that question."

Oh, the sophomore jinx question. "I’m anxious to see the reaction to the book," is all that Ali will say at the moment. And frankly? As far as Ali’s Alentejo Blue is concerned, the question is moot.

Monica Ali’s widely and deservedly praised first novel, Brick Lane (2003), told the story of a community of Bangladeshi immigrants living in public housing in London’s East End. Based on its almost Dickensian narrative energy, its graceful writing and its deep compassion for its characters, the novel became a bestseller and was a finalist for the Man Booker and Kiriyama prizes, among others. Ali, who was born in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and came to England with her Bangladeshi father and English mother in 1971 when she was three, was named as one of the 20 best young British novelists. She was hailed, along with such novelists as Zadie Smith and Hari Kunzru, as one of an exciting group of young writers giving voice to the new multi-ethnic, multicultural Great Britain.

So the first big surprise of Ali’s beautifully written new tour de force is that it is set in Portugal. Alentejo (roughly pronounced: Al en TAY zha) is a farming region of Portugal. "The particular region I’m writing about is the poorest area, very rural, where the major industries are cork oak production and wheat. It’s a beautiful area of unspoiled countryside," she says. The "blue" of the book’s title refers to the vibrant blue paint residents use to outline the doors and windows of their whitewashed farmhouses.

"I’d planned to write a completely different book, set in London and in the north of England," Ali says. But for some time she and her husband, a management consultant, had visited friends who owned a house in Alentejo, and eventually they also bought a house there, where the family now spends summer holidays. "When I would sit down at my desk in London, I would still have all these images and thoughts of Portugal, and stories and characters kept inserting themselves into my mind. I resisted for a while. I was a bit annoyed because I’d planned something else. I never really bought the idea that the material chooses you rather than you choosing it, but it turns out that it does. This was presenting itself to me, and the obvious thing was to go ahead and write it."

The second big surprise of Alentejo Blue is the range of characters and points of view Ali is able to convincingly and movingly inhabit. In Brick Lane, Ali clearly demonstrated her great understanding of human nature, but here she takes that understanding to new heights. She writes from the perspective of young and old, women and men, tourists and old-time residents. It is an astonishing performance.

"I had a sense of quite deep satisfaction with what I was doing," Ali says of the composition of the novel. " I felt that I was flexing a sort of writing muscle. I was challenging myself, and I enjoyed the challenge of getting into all those different heads."

The social center of Ali’s fictional village of Mamarrosa is Vasco’s café. Vasco, a surprisingly graceful, extraordinarily fat man, who takes great pride in the fact that he learned his trade working in restaurant kitchens in Provincetown, Massachusetts, is the comic centerpiece of the novel. Vasco’s thematic counterweight is the aged farm laborer Joao, whose lonely presence casts the shadow of the region’s history throughout the rest of Ali’s narrative.

Into Vasco’s café traipse a host of dreamers and sojourners, each of them waiting or hoping for something. Among these are a young British couple, wandering through the countryside on holiday while they try to figure out if they love each other enough to get married; the wildly dysfunctional Potts family, who left England just ahead of the law and live in fetid squalor at the edge of town; a young, dutiful local girl, Teresa, who is planning her escape from the village; and Harry Stanton, a blocked writer trying to finish his book while managing to distract himself by drinking and chasing after the Pottses.

Ali says she first thought she would write the book entirely from Harry Stanton’s perspective. "But I realized that wasn’t the right thing to do, because that character wasn’t the driving impulse. The driving impulse of Alentejo Blue was the place itself. I soon realized that I would have to develop some kind of choral range in order to give voice to the character of that place."

And this is the real achievement of Alentejo Blue. While each character’s story or vignette is wonderfully wrought, enthralling or moving, comic or tragic by itself, as they overlap and interweave, the whole becomes much greater than the sum of its parts. A reader gets an ever-deepening sense of the rhythm and the soul of a landscape and of the people who are rooted there or are just passing through.

"I’m not expecting this book to do for Alentejo what A Year in Provence did for that region," Ali says laughing. "I think this book shows a side of life that that book doesn’t. So I don’t expect a boom in property values as a result. Good thing for me. I’d have to move house again if that happened, ship out and find somewhere tranquil."

Ali says she doesn’t like to think of her work in terms of a career. She has begun writing a third novel and has done little bits of research on another idea that intrigues her, "but after that I don’t know," she says. "Maybe I don’t have any more books after that." Given the beauty of Alentejo Blue and its implicit declaration that Ali will not be limited by past achievements, let us hope for many more novels to come.

Alden Mudge writes from Oakland, California.

 

"You didn't ask the question everybody else seems to be asking," Monica Ali says at the end of our conversation about her second novel, Alentejo Blue. In less than a minute, Ali must leave her home outside London to fetch her son and daughter,…

Elizabeth Craft and Sarah Fain aren't fazed by blood the fake stuff, anyway. As writers and co-producers for the television show The Shield, it's all in a day's work to answer such questions as, Is this bloody mannequin bloody enough for you? Should we put more blood on the knife? And yet their latest endeavor, the young adult novel Bass Ackwards and Belly Up is a decidedly un-gory one. Craft and Fain have written an engaging, adventure-filled story about four longtime friends who, right after high school graduation, decide to defy convention, expectations and their parents, in the name of following their dreams. The authors know long-term friendship they've been close since the 1980s, when they were co-editors of their Kansas City, Missouri, high school newspaper. Almost 10 years later, the two reunited in Kansas City over Christmas vacation, and Sarah mentioned to Liz that she was moving to Los Angeles to pursue her dream of being a writer. We were home visiting our families, and we got together for drinks, Craft recalls. After the first beer, I was saying I'd visit Sarah in L.A., maybe even for a few weeks. By beer number three, I was thinking about moving. I stayed up all night thinking about it, and announced my decision to my family the next day. Soon after, the pair settled in a beach house in Santa Monica and began writing for television.

Now Craft and Fain share office space and writing duties at the Los Angeles headquarters of the FX police drama The Shield. We spoke with the authors via conference call as they sat at their desks, which are next to each other in a pit that used to be a storage closet, Fain says, with papers, DVDs and videocassette tapes piled high. The lived-in dŽcor doesn't hamper the writers' productivity. In fact, they didn't even take time off from television to write Bass Ackwards and Belly Up (or, as they call it, BABU). They worked on the book in the morning hours and turned back to TV later in the day. Adding a novel to their workload meant that, in addition to achieving new heights of time-management savvy, the writing partners had to reconsider the way they divvied up their workload and adjust their writing styles, too. In TV, every line on a page is a precious bit of space, Craft says. We had to get out of that mindset and realize it's OK to describe someone in detail. Fain adds, For TV, we separate our work by storyline. For the book, we separated it by character: I did Kate and Becca, and Liz did Harper and Sophie. There was never any question, the authors say, about writing for teens. We never considered another genre, Craft explains. To me, it was like therapy to write young adult fiction . . . reliving that difficult emotional time, taking my power back. It heals some wounds, to live vicariously through the characters. Emotions indeed shape the lives of BABU's four friends, who experience the fear, boredom, uncertainty and high drama that can come from living in the so-called real world. But they're also exhilarated to realize they're able to make important choices and survive hardships, whether on a trip around Europe (Kate), at college in Vermont (Becca), navigating the societal wilds of Hollywood (Sophie), or at home in Boulder attempting to write a novel (Harper). It's not lost on the four protagonists, though, that their frequent contact with one another (mainly by e-mail, as befits 21st-century teenagers) is vital to their confidence and appetite for adventure. That's no accident, says Fain: We feel very close to the story because it's about friends who support each other as they're figuring out what their dreams are, and pursuing them. We wanted to say through the lens of our own experience that anything really is possible. If you can pin down what you want, then you can go after it and get it. The authors aren't sure how many of their coworkers at The Shield will read the book; Fain says their colleagues are bemused by the writing duo's latest project. That's not altogether surprising, because, it's a very, very, very testosterone-driven environment. So, when we show up with our lovely purple-covered book, it's not anything they understand. Still, she says, testosterone (and estrogen) aside, in keeping with BABU's central message, they are very supportive, and very proud. Linda M. Castellitto writes from North Carolina, where she lives her dream of getting paid to read and write.

Elizabeth Craft and Sarah Fain aren't fazed by blood the fake stuff, anyway. As writers and co-producers for the television show The Shield, it's all in a day's work to answer such questions as, Is this bloody mannequin bloody enough for you? Should we…

America’s Founding Fathers tackled many thorny questions from the pursuit of happiness to the separation of powers but they never had to confront such controversial issues as stem cell research, Social Security or campaign finance reform. With the Founders held in high esteem, and modern politicians viewed with considerable contempt, it’s not surprising that many Americans wonder how the men who formed our nation’s government might handle today’s most difficult problems.

Journalist and historian Richard Brookhiser offers a witty and thought-provoking response in What Would the Founders Do? Their Questions, Our Answers. Plumbing the Founders’ recorded musings, Brookhiser speculates on such matters as how Alexander Hamilton would react to Hurricane Katrina (he would expect city, state and federal executives to demonstrate energy in their response) and what Thomas Jefferson might think of assisted suicide (he would support it). It quickly becomes apparent that Brookhiser, while respectful of the Founders, is no sacred textualist. He is clearly more interested in spotlighting provocative ideas than he is in presenting correct ones.

Speaking from his home in New York, Brookhiser says his inspiration for the book came from people asking him WWFD questions every time he spoke about the Founders. When he told his wife that one of his lectures on Alexander Hamilton, his historical specialty, had sparked four such inquiries, she suggested that they should be the subject of his next book. (His earlier books include Rules of Civility, Founding Father, Alexander Hamilton and The Adamses.) I tried to find as realistic answers as I could, he explains. I think the only time I’m close to being totally tongue-in-cheek is [with] the one on campaign finance reform where I say it’s a wonder that James Madison and Gouverneur Morris ever got elected to anything. I’ve been a political journalist for almost 30 years for National Review, Brookhiser explains. The way I generated the questions [was that] I just thought, What am I writing about with my National Review hat on? All the editorials that I and my colleagues write, what are they all about? . . . So I said, OK, pitch all these balls to the Founders and see how they swing at them. It was like writing 60 articles. Brookhiser rejects the notion that the Founders were all over the map philosophically and thus unlikely to be of a single mind about anything. I would say that were often all over the map politically, but I wouldn’t say [they were] philosophically. There were certain core principles that they all agreed on. It’s very interesting that the Continental Congress made lots of changes in Jefferson’s draft of the Declaration [of Independence]. But they did not touch what we regard as the most famous parts of it the opening. Hardly anything was done to that. People look to the Founders for guidance, Brookhiser thinks, because America is still a young country. They’re not that far away, he says. They’re closer than Charlemagne. And yet we have old institutions. The presidency goes back to 1789; Congress goes back to 1774. You compare that to five French republics and two empires and two kingdoms, and we have lots of continuity. Maybe the most important thing is that the Founders were politicians, and they were recognizably like modern politicians. They had to run for office. They had to say what they thought. They debated with each other. Another strand of relevance, Brookhiser notes, was that the Founders were future-oriented. They were very mindful of working for posterity and of the world watching them as examples. This was a little country, on the edge of things. But when they’re at the Constitutional Convention, Elbridge Gerry said, If we fail, we will disappoint the world.’ In an appendix, Brookhiser has some fun with the Founders when he imagines them as modern-day bloggers. The industrious Ben Franklin has three blogs Dirtyoldman, Keytech and YouSucceed to present his sides as a sensualist, scientist and self-help guru. Sam Adams blogs under BeerandLiberty. If these guys were alive now, he says, of course they’d be blogging. . . . The Patriot Act forbids me from telling you how I’m in contact with the Founders, but be assured that I am. If the author can fathom what the Founders would think about intelligent design, then it seems fair to ask him how they’d view this book about them. I think none of them would quarrel with [me] trying to do it in a popular way, he says. Almost all of them wrote journalism. Franklin would like it to the extent that it’s humorous and pulling people’s legs. In terms of what I’m saying about their thoughts, I’m sure I’d get a lot of quarrels because I’m bluntly presenting quarrels that they had. Jefferson would say, Why are you presenting Hamilton’s argument so well? I mean, really, come on!‘ And vice versa. So I’m sure I’d get a lot of that. In a way, I’m glad they’re dead. I’m sure I’d be fielding a lot of correspondence. Edward Morris is a Nashville-based writer.

America's Founding Fathers tackled many thorny questions from the pursuit of happiness to the separation of powers but they never had to confront such controversial issues as stem cell research, Social Security or campaign finance reform. With the Founders held in high esteem, and modern…

In conversation, writer Scott Smith is such an appealingly modest Midwesterner, you wonder how it is that he is thriving in megapolitan New York City. After all, he is a guy who says things like, "I always liked writing. But I never entitled myself to the idea that I could make a living being a writer. Growing up in Ohio that seemed hubristic. Just not allowed." Or, regarding his writing habits, "I'm very distractible, but I am comfortable with my distractibility."

On the other hand, Smith is the same fellow who, fresh out of the Columbia University MFA writing program, penned the mesmerizing best-selling novel, A Simple Plan, a harrowing morality tale of a sort-of-normal, sort-of-understandable progression of evil in which nine people end up getting murdered. Smith then went on to write the screenplay for the somewhat different, but equally chilling movie version of A Simple Plan, directed by Sam Raimi and starring Bill Paxton, Billy Bob Thornton and Bridget Fonda. And now he has completed the deeply scary (and sometimes darkly humorous) horror novel The Ruins. For which he is, of course, writing the screenplay.

So perhaps some deeper, darker (and more darkly comic) current flows through Smith's veins – an effervescent sort of ice water, perhaps – that allows him to live as comfortably as a New Yorker as he once did as a Midwesterner.

But if Smith is aware of the deep fissure that yawns open between the memorably creepy products of his imagination and his friendly, sincere, self-effacing, humorous and somewhat bemused conversational self, he's not copping to it during a phone call to his apartment on Manhattan's Upper West Side. He tiptoes to the brink of admission when he remarks that his wife, Elizabeth Hill, a writer he met in grad school, is his first reader and the reader he has in mind when he writes his novels, and then adds, deadpan, "Even though she's my ideal reader, she's not my ideal reader, since she hasn't finished either of my books. They make her too uncomfortable. I guess."

For readers who enjoy being so discomfited that the hair on their neck stands on end, however, The Ruins is just the book to curl up with on a dark and stormy night. Unfortunately, what is best and most interesting about The Ruins – particularly the way Smith toys with our expectations about what a horror/survival tale should be is impossible to discuss without stealing from would-be readers the novel's most hair-raising pleasures.

In The Ruins, two young couples on a post-graduation vacation in Cancun agree to help a German youth they've met on the beach locate his brother, who has impetuously gone off with a pretty archeologist to a dig at nearby Mayan ruins in the jungle. The five, plus a happy-go-lucky Greek tourist they meet along the way, set off on their little dirt-road trip, despite increasingly ominous signs, and are soon trapped at the hilltop ruins, awaiting rescue, while a very scary entity tries to lure them to their deaths. From there things go from grim to grimmer.

"I had a short story idea about a group of archeologists who dig up a disease that sickens everyone back when I was in graduate school," Smith says. "Scraps of paper, an idea I never did anything with." He stuck it in a folder and went on to other things.

After completing A Simple Plan, Smith worked for five years on a novel about a feud in a small town. He ended up with over a thousand pages, which, he says, was about a quarter of the imagined book. A monstrosity. "I couldn't stop writing and I knew it wasn't going to work, so I fled to screenwriting. The opportunities were there after the movie of A Simple Plan came out, and I had a sense there was a window of opportunity that was going to shut very rapidly."

He worked on a number of projects with Ben Stiller, who at one point had planned to direct A Simple Plan. He adapted a history book about Edwin and John Wilkes Booth. He worked on a comedy. He adapted the Richard Stark novel Backflash. "I've been lucky in terms of the people I've worked with," Smith says. "They've given me a lot of leeway. I haven't had any of those horror stories that you read about between studio executives and screenwriters."

When Smith decided to attempt another novel, he opted to do a genre-based book with a strong plot. "I had just seen the movie Signs and thought it would be fun to create that horror movie chill effect. When I went back through my folder of ideas and came across this archeologist idea, I thought, what if they dig up something that isn't a disease but has a horror element instead."

The Ruins, as the author points out, is "oddly internal" for a horror novel. Smith allows readers to peer intently into the psyches of his four main characters as their love and friendships begin to crack under the pressure of the threat to their individual survival. This adds greatly to a reader's growing sense of doom. "When it came to choices, I would always opt to push it further," Smith says, "because I have an instinct that if I'm uncomfortable with it, I should do it."

Yet according to Smith, his seemingly well-crafted horror novel just sort of happened, without anywhere near the degree of planning and plotting that went into his first novel. Asked, for example, about a darkly comic and deviously resonant scene in which the central characters imagine who will play them in the movie version of their escape tale, Smith says, simply, "I needed them to have something to talk about. And that just came the day that I wrote it."

Hmmm.

But then again maybe one needn't – or shouldn't – probe too deeply for the sources of this casual, dark inspiration. Maybe it's enough simply to echo the cover blurb's exclamation that the product of Smith's inspiration and labors is "unputdownable."

Unputdownable? Is that a word? "I wondered about that myself," Smith says laughing. But real word or not, it's an apt description of Scott Smith's The Ruins.

Alden Mudge writes from Oakland, California.

Author photo by Joyce Ravid.

In conversation, writer Scott Smith is such an appealingly modest Midwesterner, you wonder how it is that he is thriving in megapolitan New York City. After all, he is a guy who says things like, "I always liked writing. But I never entitled myself…

Sara Gruen keeps her cat's ashes in an urn behind her desk and donates a portion of her book royalties to animal charities. It's not terribly surprising, then, that one of the most memorable characters in this animal lover's new novel is a pachyderm named Rosie.

"I've always been a complete sucker for animals," says Gruen, whose novel Water for Elephants has garnered considerable buzz for its offbeat story of a Depression-era traveling circus. "I didn't realize that maybe other people weren't until recently. I've always been 'Feed the wild ones, tame the stray ones.' "

Gruen's own menagerie—which she shares with her husband and three young sons—includes four cats, a dog, a horse and goats. Gruen spoke with BookPage recently from her home in an environmental community north of Chicago, where the residents live in energy-efficient homes and share an organic farm and a charter school.

It was in this bucolic setting that Gruen started writing her third novel (following Riding Lessons and Flying Changes) after intensive research that included several family visits to circus shows. But Water for Elephants almost didn't happen: Distraction after distraction kept Gruen from finishing the book, including the usual family illnesses and a technical-writing project that dragged on for four months.

"I found it very difficult to get back into the characters," she recalls. "I almost gave it up."

Gruen laughs as she explains the sensory-deprivation method she finally employed to buckle down and finish the book—she moved her desk to a walk-in closet, covered the window, turned off the phones and wore earplugs.

"I hope to never have to do that again!" she says.

The result was worth the struggle. Water for Elephants is the remarkable, captivating story of the Benzini Brothers Most Spectacular Show on Earth, a 1930s traveling circus fighting to stay solvent during the Great Depression.

Gruen brings to life a fascinating, nearly forgotten world of big tops and bearded ladies, in a time when the circus coming to town was a rare treat for those suffering through one of the bleakest chapters in our nation's history.

The story is also a bittersweet statement on growing old in modern America. Jacob Jankowski, who is either 90 or 93 years old (he's not entirely sure anymore), whiles away his days in a nursing home, missing his wife and his life. His children and grandchildren come to visit, but he finds it increasingly difficult to keep them all straight. When a traveling circus sets up in the parking lot next to his residence, his shaky mind is transported back to his days as the Benzini circus veterinarian.

After young Jacob's parents die in a car accident, he abandons his veterinary studies at Cornell and hops a Benzini train. He is soon taking care of a host of big cats, monkeys and horses, and spending his nights with the circus crew drinking bottles of the foulest bootleg imaginable.

Jacob is quickly captivated by Marlena, the lovely but married star of the Benzini show. Her husband August is a dashing, vicious man who trains (and often beats) the circus animals. Rosie, the prized elephant that the Benzini show bought from a failed competitor, is often at the wrong end of August's wrath. Eventually, so is Jacob.

Gruen was one day away from starting a new novel on an entirely different topic when she read a newspaper feature about famed circus photographer Edward J. Kelty. In the years after World War I, Kelty followed circuses around the country, capturing mesmerizing images of sword swallowers, giants and midgets.

Gruen saw Kelty's work and thought, "Wow! I could put a novel in that." She set aside her other project and began researching the unique community of circus workers.

"I wanted to preserve a snapshot of that very extreme culture, because it's gone," she says.

The book is stuffed with authentic, largely forgotten details about life during the Depression. Gruen writes about a grizzled circus worker named Camel suffering from "Jake Leg." The condition afflicted tens of thousands of people who drank a Jamaican ginger extract during Prohibition, not knowing that it could cause paralysis.

Getting the historical details right was painstaking work, but Gruen found she had no trouble capturing the nuances of Jacob, a crotchety nonagenarian.

"He was the one who was just there," she says. "I think it scared my husband. I just turned on the tap and there's this cantankerous old man."

"It was much more difficult to write the historical chapters," she says. "You know, was there running water in a 1930s train car? I would finish those chapters with my tongue hanging out. Then I'd reach the safety of Jacob's nursing home."

Some of the history included in the book—such as Jake Leg and the rampant abuse of circus animals and workers—is haunting, but Gruen doesn't flinch from that reality.

In one of the book's many poignant moments, Jacob discovers why the elephant Rosie is so seemingly ill-suited for circus life, leading to her many beatings at the hands of August. In her author's note, Gruen makes clear that such abuse is historically accurate. A 1930s elephant named Topsy killed her trainer after he fed her a lit cigarette.

"Topsy's owners at Coney Island's Luna Park decided to turn her execution into a public spectacle," Gruen writes. "But the announcement that they were going to hang her met with uproar—after all, wasn't hanging a cruel and unusual punishment?"

The elephant was electrocuted in front of 1,500 spectators.

Sad? Absolutely. But if anything, discovering such stories while writing Water for Elephants only intensified Gruen's devotion to animals.

"I came into this project loving elephants, but now I'm absolutely besotted," Gruen laughs.

Amy Scribner writes from Olympia, Washington.

 

Sara Gruen keeps her cat's ashes in an urn behind her desk and donates a portion of her book royalties to animal charities. It's not terribly surprising, then, that one of the most memorable characters in this animal lover's new novel is a pachyderm named…

Laura Lippman’s crime fiction isn’t torn from the headlines in quite the way one might expect from a former news reporter for the Baltimore Sun. In fact, Lippman’s well-crafted, thought-provoking private eye series featuring Tess Monaghan, as well as her equally compelling stand-alone mysteries, tend to focus on the very people who don’t make the headlines: the poor, the disenfranchised, the minorities and the young people who frequently fall through the sometimes gaping cracks in our human services.

Though she long ago clocked out of daily journalism, Lippman stays close to the poverty and social issues she used to cover by working at a Baltimore soup kitchen on weekends. It was there that she met the struggling teens that inspired Lloyd Jupiter, a homeless, 15-year-old African American who stumbles into very big trouble in Lippman’s ninth Tess Monaghan adventure, No Good Deeds.

It is Tess’ live-in boyfriend Crow who performs good deeds by delivering food to local food kitchens. On his rounds, he encounters Lloyd, who tries to jack him for $5 to change a flat tire that Crow suspects the teenager had caused just minutes before. Instead, Crow offers him shelter from the winter cold. Tess is wary of the troubled kid at her dinner table until, by chance, he indicates he has secret knowledge about the death of Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory Youssef, whose recent murder has all the earmarks of an unofficial cover-up. When word of Lloyd’s secret brings the feds, the DEA and the FBI down on Tess, Crow takes Lloyd into hiding in hopes of keeping him alive until the case is solved. As the saying goes, no good deed goes unpunished.

" This novel started out as a straight-up homage to Robert Parker’s Early Autumn, in which Spenser takes this kid out into the country and they build a house together and he changes his life. I just loved that book," Lippman says. "But once I created Lloyd Jupiter, I just realized that it would be utterly false to solve all the problems in Lloyd’s life."

Realism above all is central to Lippman’s fiction, even if it means sacrificing the warm-fuzzy endings we all wish for.

"When you’re 15, you find your parents embarrassing no matter what; imagine being 15 and your mom is a heroin addict who is nodding off next to you at the soup kitchen. I don’t know how to say to that kid, well, just work harder, go to school and you’ll be fine. I feel like that is just a callous lie in some ways," she says.

"We’re asking these kids to be geniuses of survival. We don’t expect every kid coming up in a poor neighborhood to have the amazing skills of a LeBron James, we don’t view that as reasonable, but we do kind of ask or assume that they can be in the 99th percentile of survival ability. I was hoping in writing No Good Deeds that people would open their hearts just a little bit to just how difficult it is."

Lippman is equally committed to keeping Tess real.

"The joke in my household is that I like to write characters that are smaller than life," she says. "She’s really flawed; she was always meant to be that, because personally, I don’t like reading about perfect people. I don’t know any, and if I did I would probably find them annoying. I didn’t want Tess to be my fantasy projection. In some ways, I’m a lot smarter than Tess. I always wanted her to be realistic. She throws up in trash cans," Lippman laughs.

An interesting metamorphosis does occur for Tess over the course of No Good Deeds.

"For the average person, the kinds of choices that a kid like Lloyd Jupiter makes are just baffling, they go against everything we think we know about the value of hard work and going to school and paying attention. But as time goes on, Tess herself becomes increasingly skeptical of authority, is scared to tell the truth, doesn’t know who she can trust, and her situation comes to mirror Lloyd’s."

Lippman has always had a strong affinity for the juvenile characters that manage to work their way into the heart of her stories. But expect Tess to have a child of her own any time soon. "I don’t think Tess can have a baby and continue in this series," Lippman says. "I think she could get married but I think the minute you give your character a child, the reader’s tolerance for some of the things Tess does just disappears. If she risks herself, then she risks her child losing a mother. I’ll never say never, but I can’t see it for Tess right now."

After all, Tess has taken on iconic status for Baltimore in the same way Spenser did for Boston and Michael Connelly’s Harry Bosch did for Los Angeles. "One of the spoilers I tell readers is, if you see a character of mine who doesn’t like Baltimore very much, you know there’s something wrong with that guy," Lippman chuckles.

Her reportorial eye for detail, understated prose style and emotional realism have elevated Lippman to the A-list of literary crime writers alongside Lehane, Connelly, Harlan Coben, Robert Crais and George Pelecanos. Lippman suspects the best contemporary literature can now be found in the mystery genre.

"Raymond Chandler said that the difference between literary fiction and crime fiction is that the ordinary mystery gets published and the ordinary literary novel does not. I don’t think that’s true anymore. I love my genre. Why would I want to transcend it? Why would I want to break out of it? It’s a big territory, but the really interesting work is being done at the borderlands."

Jay MacDonald is a writer in Oxford, Mississippi.

 

Laura Lippman's crime fiction isn't torn from the headlines in quite the way one might expect from a former news reporter for the Baltimore Sun. In fact, Lippman's well-crafted, thought-provoking private eye series featuring Tess Monaghan, as well as her equally compelling stand-alone mysteries,…

With the new century, classical music is igniting more and more curiosity and wonderstruck devotion on the part of an ever-growing number of listeners. The statement sounds like magical thinking, but it’s borne out by facts and figures: rising classical CD and iTunes sales, the construction of new concert halls across the country, the level of renewed interest in music by living composers, and in timely response to all these events the appearance of Ted Libbey’s exceptionally well-crafted NPR Listener’s Encyclopedia of Classical Music (also available in hardcover), the long-gestated, vastly ambitious companion to his popular NPR Guide to Building a Classical CD Collection.

In an interview with BookPage, Libbey characterized the burgeoning audience for his new, thousand-page guide: As the title suggests, this book belongs to listeners people who want to learn more about the music they like and be led toward new discoveries. As former music critic for the New York Times and longtime presenter on NPR’s Performance Today, Libbey understands the needs of this readership better than anyone else in the business.

Libbey’s decisions on what to include in the Encyclopedia and what to leave out took considerable soul-searching and countless winnowings. In the end, his selections reflect a solid practicality: I used the repertory of concert programs and available recordings as my guide, explains the author. There needs to be a way for the reader to follow up, a chance that the music might be heard. The generosity of subjects composers, individual pieces, genres, performers, definitions of musical terminology extends to the marvelously subjective language of individual entries. The author’s personal judgments on composers and their masterworks make for the liveliest kind of reading. I wanted to provide an assessment, not just a recitation of facts, he says. Still, there are very few Ôknocks’ in the book. Indeed, Libbey’s prose achieves its most vivid lyricism, as well as its definitive authority, in praise of certain composers. Of Anton Bruckner’s Symphony No. 7, he writes, The mystical tranquility and paroxysmal ecstasy he expressed in the slow movement . . . remain unique in the symphonic canon, as does the desolate, mysterious beauty of the Ninth. Libbey smiles when this passage comes up in our conversation. My father who played an important role in inspiring my interest in music when I was a teenager is now reading the book from cover to cover. He’s made it to the end of the B’s and Bruckner stands out for him as someone who must be investigated. Clearly, for Libbey, introducing Bruckner to this particular, very careful reader signifies a special fulfillment of the book’s purpose a reimbursement in the same coin for all the music his father gave to him when he was a boy.

The NPR Listener’s Encyclopedia of Classical Music brings together two further glories, neither one of which is currently available in any other publication. First is the beguiling and immensely instructive set of images that accompany the text, chosen by Libbey himself. As much as anything in his writing, the presence of so many delightful and historic photographs demonstrates Libbey’s enormous range of knowledge.

Second, and most thrilling of all, is the creation of a website developed jointly by Workman Publishing and Naxos Records featuring 525 recorded examples of musical works and terms discussed in the book. Peppered on almost every page of the Encyclopedia are the little disc symbols referring the reader to these audio links. As Libbey gleefully observes, It’s like giving the reader a 50-CD library to take home when they buy the book. Why such a groundswell in the classical music market in recent years? Could it be that the beauty and spiritual complexity of this repertory feed a hunger newly felt in the 21st century? It is certainly the case that the things we come to love best are often the things we can never fully understand. Ted Libbey is the best possible facilitator toward the impossible understanding of great music, all the more trustworthy because of his loving regard for what he had to exclude from this book. New discoveries of little-known masterpieces that’s the next book, promises Libbey. As our listening becomes curiouser and curiouser (thanks to him), we shall hold him to that promise. Michael Alec Rose is a composer who teaches at Vanderbilt’s Blair School of Music.

With the new century, classical music is igniting more and more curiosity and wonderstruck devotion on the part of an ever-growing number of listeners. The statement sounds like magical thinking, but it's borne out by facts and figures: rising classical CD and iTunes sales,…

There's a major shift in the way businesses offer their products to the public, according to Wired editor-in-chief Chris Anderson. His new book, The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More, explores the ways in which our culture and economy are moving away from hits (popular products and markets), which reside at the head of the demand curve, and toward a huge number of niches in the tail of that curve. This Long Tail is resulting in a massive increase in choices for consumers, who until now have, by and large, unwittingly had their tastes shaped by what is widely available or most popular. BookPage asked Anderson, who writes a popular blog on the subject, to explain it all; he responded from a plane high over Texas.

What do you mean by the Long Tail?
Last year, 65,000 music albums were released only 700 made it to the shelves of America's No. 1 CD retailer, Wal-Mart. If you're into anything that isn't in the top 700 (whether it's non-mainstream or simply not a new release), you understand the Long Tail. Likewise if you're into documentaries, foreign films, or any other kind of movie that isn't stocked at Blockbuster. Many interesting examples were put forward by readers of the [Long Tail] blog, too, such as microbrews as the Long Tail of beer and insurgency as the Long Tail of warfare.

You emphasize that, while choice is certainly preferable to scarcity, there remains a need for good filters to help people find their way through myriad options. What are the best filters?
Amazon continues to lead the way. It has good examples of the most important kinds of filters: search, personalized recommendations, reviews, rankings, even specialized filters such as statistically improbable phrases. Outside of books, Google is of course the ultimate filter and the innovation around helping you find music you'll like is just beginning.

You say the alternative to let people choose is choose for them. How do we know the limits of our filters?
I'm against choosing for people if that means guessing what they want and offering only that. I believe the best technique is to order choice in ways that reflect individuals' expressed and observed preferences, while still offering unbounded variety. The best filters will get this right and be rewarded with happy consumers; others will have to evolve until they get it right.

How should businesses alter their approaches as niches become more plentiful and influential?
Those who can see the world outside the hits will prosper most. That means understanding how to market to niches and make a profit from modest sales. A key tactic will be the ability to scale down achieve economic efficiencies so you don't have to just focus on hits. That can be as simple as digital distribution, which drops the marginal cost of goods close to zero, or as complicated as self-service, giving customers the tools to help themselves.

But hits are here to stay?
The curve that defines the Long Tail is ubiquitous in everything from markets to nature. It is, above all, one of inequality: a few things have high impact and a large number of things have low impact. This is as true of music albums as it is of earthquakes. Some things are always going to be more popular than others, and word-of-mouth will exaggerate those differences. But the difference between hits and niches seems to be shrinking: there's now room for both of them, so it's not hits or niches, but hits and niches.

The Long Tail blog's tagline is a public diary on the way to a book. How did the blog shape the book?
The blog was a fantastic aid. It had three advantages for me, in writing a nonfiction, research-heavy book based on a published article [Wired, Oct. 2004]: 1) It allowed me to keep the momentum going between the publication of the article and the book; 2) I gave away some of my research results and ideas, but got back many times that from my smart readers; 3) Those thousands of readers have great word-of-mouth influence, which I imagine will help market the book. I was so encouraged by my experience, I'm thinking of ways to introduce some of that technique to Wired.

Are there more books in your future?
Absolutely, but I've promised my wife I'd finish the book tour for this one before turning to the next!

There's a major shift in the way businesses offer their products to the public, according to Wired editor-in-chief Chris Anderson. His new book, The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More, explores the ways in which our culture and economy…

If you reduced the novels, short stories and poetry of Elizabeth Cox to a bumper sticker, it would read: "Life is messy." It is the very untidiness of our ordinary lives, filled with unpredictable and uncontrollable acts of both cruelty and kindness, that consistently grabs her attention, worms its way into her subconscious and eventually springs to life in her work. This distillation process takes time; try as she might, this assured and patient Southern literary voice has managed to produce just three novels and a short story collection during the past two decades while teaching creative writing at Duke, MIT and elsewhere. A poem she recently published in the Atlantic took her 12 years to write. All of which makes the appearance of a new Cox novel a welcome surprise on the order of the Hale-Bopp comet.

In her new novel, The Slow Moon, Cox transports us to South Pittsburg, Tennessee, where the lives of teenage friends will change forever in a single night. When young lovers Crow and Sophie slip away from a late-night party to make love for the first time, the deep wood seems a perfectly romantic setting. But life is messy, and Crow has left his condom in the car. He leaves the disrobed Sophie to retrieve it, only to be delayed again by circumstances. When he returns 20 minutes later, he finds her unconscious, raped and badly battered.

Although most of the close-knit town folk doubt that Crow, the clean-cut scion of the wealthy sawmill owner, had any part in the brutal attack, the traumatized Sophie can’t recall and he’s charged with the crime. Cox uses the days leading up to the trial shrewdly by winding the narrative through the viewpoints of Sophie and Crow, Crow’s younger brother Johnny, Crow’s rock-band mates and their parents. In the process, she wins our empathy for all, even as we slowly realize that the guilty may be among them.

"It’s fascinating how one thing can open up so many different people’s lives, and in fact the life of a whole town. It opens vulnerability everywhere," Cox says from her home in Spartanburg, South Carolina. "It seems like if it’s not vulnerable, it’s pretending; we’re all pretending to be something in front of the world and then something happens and it shows us who we are, hopefully. The beautiful thing to me is when we take a hard look at it and then live with that. If we don’t, then it seems like we’re lost."

The mystery that drives The Slow Moon took seed in Cox’s subconscious seven years ago.

"I watched the Columbine school shootings and I wanted to write something about that and I didn’t because every time I tried to make those boys gothic it didn’t work for me. So I made them regular boys who did something horrendous," she says. "I know that very often motives are looked for, but I’m not sure if we ever really understand. I think what drives people to do something like that is so deep that to apply a motive feels a little bit pretentious. We look for it and want it, but if we really look at it, it’s the need for something from the father or mother or for some connection within the family that comes out in violent ways in the community. But boy, that is a tight wire to walk."

Cox has long taught her students to "listen to their story" and let it develop organically. She neither plots nor prods her own fiction, but instead lets it linger in her subconscious until it is ready to make its appearance on the page.

"I read a lot of Carl Jung, and as I move into this, I just trust the unconscious and the messiness of it," she explains. "I have to stay with it long enough to find the sense of it, but it’s always deep sense. It doesn’t always make sense intellectually, but it does gutturally, and that’s the sense I always trust, the sense of the gut. That’s the deep pleasure of writing. It takes me a long time so I don’t have as many books as other people, but that’s what I do."

When her narrative threatens to become prosaic, Cox will inject a passage of stream-of-consciousness free verse to jolt herself and her readers awake. Here’s one: "She got up and went to the closet, lifted one of Carl’s sports jackets, trying to imagine where she would go if she left him. The idea lay in her mind like an egg, broken, its yolk running through her body, making yellow the dreams that came with leaving."

Huh? Cox laughs at the mention of her sneaky passages.

"If it’s going along too smoothly, I like to ripple the water," she admits. "You know how a poem hits you in the same place a joke hits you, not quite the gut but the midriff? If I’m going along and haven’t been to that place recently, I don’t do it on purpose but I know the words come in from the side and I write those down and think, yeah, that’s right for here. It doesn’t make all that much sense but it’s right for here. It’s a sign to go deeper. I’ve always thought that my job in life is to tell people that it’s more complicated than that."

Cox’s frustration at her own snail’s-pace process may be coming to an end. In January, she and husband C. Michael Curtis, a senior editor at the Atlantic, moved to Spartanburg to become co-chairs of humanities at Wofford College, freeing up more time for writing. She now has not one but two new novels in progress for the first time in her life.

"They’re very different and I have no idea if it’s the same book or if one precedes the other or if in understanding one you will understand the other," she says.

In short, it’s another fine mess, and she wouldn’t have it otherwise.

Jay MacDonald lives to write and writes to live in Mississippi.

 

If you reduced the novels, short stories and poetry of Elizabeth Cox to a bumper sticker, it would read: "Life is messy." It is the very untidiness of our ordinary lives, filled with unpredictable and uncontrollable acts of both cruelty and kindness, that consistently grabs…

For a first-time novelist, tackling a book that traces the intertwined stories of several generations of Jewish immigrants is ambitious, to say the least. Wouldn’t it be simpler to ease in with a breezy novel about bad boyfriends or career troubles? But Jennifer Gilmore doesn’t shy away from a challenge. As publicity director for Harcourt, she knows just how much work is involved in transforming a good idea into a finished book, yet she went for it anyway.

Golden Country is the sweeping, luminous story of 20th-century New York City immigrants with pasts marred by tragedy and futures filled with promise. Traveling salesman Joseph Brodsky is sure he is on the verge of inventing a product that will revolutionize the way America cleans. Seymour Bloom yearns to trade in a life of organized crime for one as a Broadway producer. Frances Gold wants to be a star.

Gilmore recently answered some questions about the immigrant experience and her leap-of-faith in taking on a new role in the publishing industry.

You’ve said that your novel is inspired by your own family’s American experience. Who is the most colorful member of your real-life family?
The most colorful member of my family was probably my grandmother. She told dirty jokes, did crosswords while smoking on the toilet, and used to sneak Dove Bars from the deep freeze in her garage in Portland, Maine. My great-grandmother Grandma G was also quite something. She came from Montmartre in Paris, was a Lane Bryant model for a while, and used to shake me and tell me she loved me to pieces!

So many of the characters in Golden Country struggle to realize their American dreams. What’s one of your lifelong dreams? Have you achieved it yet?
I am interested a lot in failure, the flip side of the American Dream, and my dreams always felt suffused with this. It’s part of life, but our dreams get so curtailed. Mine, truly, was to write a book and have it published. I think it was my only dream. When I was a little girl, I had no idea how difficult that would be.

Your very vivid portrait of New York City from the 1920s to the 1960s reveals your affection for the city. What’s your favorite thing about New York?
There are so many lovely things about New York, it’s difficult to pick only one. I think the wonderful things about living here are small and everyday: Prospect Park before 9 a.m., walking down Fifth Avenue, rooftops. And then there is going to the theater, which I have been lucky enough to do since I was a kid visiting the city heading into Times Square, or Lincoln Center or BAM, waiting in the velvet seats for the curtain to swing open.

As Harcourt’s publicity director, you’ve spent much of your career on the business side of publishing. How is it being on the author side of the experience?
Being on both sides is actually quite difficult. You know everything that can go wrong, and you know all a publisher can do to help a book. The surprise is that everything is still so surprising to me: getting the cover, the first reviews, seeing it bound up in book form. And I’m also surprised by my disappointment. Sometimes it feels like: all this work six years! for this? A book is a very strange thing. . . .

You’ve read a lot of books in your line of work. Which authors inspire you?
The authors who inspire me are the same ones that have since before I even came to New York. Philip Roth, Delmore Schwartz, Grace Paley, Carson McCullers. I have since added Zadie Smith to my list. Through my job I have worked with some wonderful writers Umberto Eco, Michel Faber, Amos Oz, to name a few but the authors I read from the beginning are the ones my mind returns to time and again.

In Golden Country, Joseph Brodsky developed his cleaning product in the basement. Another character, Vladimir Zworykin, worked at the office late into the night on his invention. What was your process for writing this book?
I wish I wrote at night! My life would be a lot easier. But I am one of those people who needs to get up at the crack of dawn and write before work. I’m a morning writer the impurities of the day get to me.

So, are you treating the publicity folks for this book extra nicely?
Most people turn this question around and ask if I am being horrid to publicity! I am trying to treat my publicist with respect and be aware of her time, which sometimes authors forget to do. Publicity is the end of the line in the very long process in a book’s life and it causes incredible anxiety for authors. I admit, I feel that part too.

 

For a first-time novelist, tackling a book that traces the intertwined stories of several generations of Jewish immigrants is ambitious, to say the least. Wouldn't it be simpler to ease in with a breezy novel about bad boyfriends or career troubles? But Jennifer Gilmore…

According to Janet Fitch, the overwhelming success of her previous novel White Oleander, an Oprah pick, was a mixed blessing. On the plus side, there was the fame, there was the fortune, there was the dinner with actress Michelle Pfeiffer, who picked Fitch’s brain about the character she would be playing in the movie version of the book.

On the downside, there was the internalized pressure to produce something bigger, better, even more ambitious in her next book. Fitch had been a history major at Reed College until her 21st birthday, the day she decided to become a novelist. So for a follow-up to White Oleander, she determined to write a historical novel. It grew and grew and grew without becoming quite anything, and in the end she had to write off three years of work as a demoralizing disaster.

"When I was finally able to say it was a massive traffic accident and walk away from it," Fitch says, " I started looking through old stories and found this three-person story called Love in the Asylum’ and thought I could do something with it."

The result of her expansion and alteration of that early story is Paint It Black, a passionate novel that Fitch likens to Edgar Allan Poe’s The Fall of the House of Usher – not because it follows Poe’s storyline in any way but because it concerns itself, in part, with the internal corruption and destruction of a prominent musical family, and because the novel does cast a Poe-like shadowy spell.

Which is something of a surprise, given the fact that Paint It Black is set in the vividly described 1980s punk rock scene in Los Angeles and its heroine is Josie Tyrell, a runaway from Bakersfield, who earns a living as an artist’s model and actress in student films while orbiting at the edges of the scene.

"The punk era was such a good moment for me," Fitch says during a call to her home in Los Angeles, where she lives with her 16-year-old daughter. "There was a philosophy in punk – DIY, do it yourself – the idea that things don’t have to be perfect, you just do them, you don’t need anybody’s seal of approval. And that was really good for me. At the time that I was writing this book it was something that I needed to remember. So it seemed very right that the setting should be the punk era. The feel of that period is very sharp for me."

The "persistently defiant" Josie falls in love with Michael Faraday, a well-bred, talented, idealistic art student and the son of an overly controlling mother, Meredith Loewy, who is a wealthy, world-class concert pianist. When Michael commits suicide near the beginning of the novel, Josie’s journey becomes a struggle to comprehend Michael’s torment and the meaning of her love and loss, which quickly places her in a psychologically fraught relationship with Michael’s powerful mother.

"There were a lot of things I was dealing with immediately and critically at the time I was writing Paint It Black," Fitch says, pointing to the emotional wellspring of the book. "Depression, perfectionism, maybe a way out of perfectionism. I like to work on things that are loaded. When you start a novel you want a situation that is really loaded, where there is enough tension in the initial situation that it will power your book. The most personal aspect of Paint It Black is the dialectic between Michael and Josie in terms of knowledge and perfectionism. There is a dance between your level of permissiveness in yourself and the demands your aspirations place on yourself. So Josie is my permissiveness and Michael is my perfectionism. And what happens to perfectionism? On a sliding scale, I think it’s better to go with permissiveness."

Fitch varies the mood of Paint It Black with some fine and funny satirical sketches of the student filmmakers who occasionally employ Josie in their productions. " I went to film school, briefly," Fitch says. "The level of self-importance is unbelievable. The harder you’re working, the less money you’re making, the more grandiose the fantasy. There’s definitely a comic element to it. But it is also another way to look at art and ambition, in opposition to Michael’s ambition. Michael is as serious as cancer, but other people have ambitions too, although their ambitions are not necessarily as serious or as well thought out."

Fitch also proves adept at exploring the nuances of the class divide that separates the untutored, working-class Josie Tyrell from the cultured, sophisticated Meredith Loewy. Maybe this is not so surprising, since in her long apprenticeship before the publication of White Oleander, Fitch supported herself for years as a typesetter, moving around the West and Northwest as the opportunities presented themselves. "Nobody sees the haves like the have-nots," she says. "Josie was brought up with the kind of people who never expected anything, which is why she is so defiant. She shapes her environment by making boundaries, whereas Michael and Meredith create their world directly. They know what they want from the world and the world just better deliver it."

But where Paint It Black is best is in the sensory detail of the place and time it describes. "One of tragedies of our times is that we’re cut off from our senses," Fitch says in what she calls one of her writerly rants. "We’re able to control our environment to the point that we don’t feel anything. We don’t feel, we don’t smell, we’re not rubbed the wrong way. But as animals we crave sensory stimulation. People work in windowless, air-conditioned environments in beige and gray, stare at the screen all day, go down in the elevator, get in their air-conditioned cars, and go home and watch a flat screen. I think when people read, they read to be reattached to a sensual world. So it’s really important for writers to remember to reawaken the reader to the experience of the senses, to put the reader physically in the character and in the story. That makes it vivid for the reader."

In Paint It Black, Fitch practices what she preaches.

Alden Mudge is a juror for the California Book Awards.

 

According to Janet Fitch, the overwhelming success of her previous novel White Oleander, an Oprah pick, was a mixed blessing. On the plus side, there was the fame, there was the fortune, there was the dinner with actress Michelle Pfeiffer, who picked Fitch's brain…

Somewhere in Edward P. Jones’ apartment, mixed in among his collections of American stamps and thimble-sized Japanese netsuke figurines, is a Pulitzer Prize for his 2003 debut novel, The Known World. The Washington, D.C., native moved just north of Georgetown following a book tour two years ago but has yet to unpack his sizable book collection or even acquire furniture. Forced to leave the Arlington, Virginia, apartment he’d called home for two decades due to noisy neighbors, he’s literally waiting for the other shoe to drop on this place before he commits.

"They assured me I wouldn’t have a noise problem because this place is carpeted, but last August I started hearing a lot of stomping and that really got me," he says. "I don’t want to take my stuff out of boxes if I’m going to have a noise problem."

It’s a problem he won’t have to worry about for a while. This fall, Jones is back on tour with All Aunt Hagar’s Children, his second extraordinary short story collection that explores the unseen Washington where African Americans struggle with poverty, racism and violence.

How do you follow a Pulitzer-winning performance like The Known World, a sprawling historical tour de force based on the little-known fact that freed blacks actually owned slaves? Jones found inspiration in the characters and storylines in his debut collection, Lost in the City, which garnered a National Book Award nomination nearly 15 years ago.

"You could read nine or 10 of the stories in Lost in the City and pick them up in some cases and continue them in All Aunt Hagar’s Children," he says. "I never thought about revisiting that place. It’s just one of those strange things that happen when you have an imagination. Once you start pulling out the thread of that big ball, it continues and continues and can go on until you just put a stop to it."

Written in Jones’ deceptively simple prose style, the 14 stories collected here crackle with life as the author explores the inner lives of dreamers, redeemers, rendered families and troubled souls who transit through the District. Jones focuses on the African-American sections, primarily north and northwest, where the grandsons and granddaughters of Southern sharecroppers eke out a living in the service industries. It’s an area Jones knows well.

Unlike Lost, which took place in ’60s and ’70s Washington, this collection spans the 20th century; as a result, many of the stories are prequels rather than sequels to their Lost companion pieces.

One of Jones’ great gifts is the telling detail, whether it’s the war-shocked Korean War vet who lovingly dresses the body of his ex-girlfriend for burial in "Old Boys, Old Girls," a Hi-C-sipping Satan in "The Devil Swims Across the Anacostia River" or an R-rated mynah bird who punctuates the title story with heat-of-passion exclamations.

If Lost in the City was modeled on James Joyce’s Dubliners, these expansive new stories, several of which emotionally qualify as novellas, carry a whiff of the fantastic that brings to mind Calvino or Borges, two authors Jones admits he has only read sparingly.

A peaceful sanctuary is particularly important to the 55-year-old bachelor and admitted homebody whose childhood was one of constant relocation within the nation’s capital. His mother, who worked minimum-wage jobs to feed her three children, could neither read nor write, but instilled in Jones a love of learning. Except for his college years at Holy Cross in Worchester, Massachusetts, where he earned an English degree, Jones has lived in and around Washington all his life.

In fact, nightmares of moving plague Jones to this day. A non-driver, he once said he would not want to own a car because he could not bring it into his apartment at night.

"You wonder, how can I get my whole life into this one room, or this one apartment, or the next apartment?" he says. "If I knew a way that I could write something that would kill off all those dreams, I would do it, but I don’t. My plan one day is to write a story that begins, ‘We never get over having been children.’ "

His Pulitzer Prize, followed quickly by a MacArthur Fellowship, gave Jones the freedom to write fulltime. Prior to that, he worked for 19 years summarizing articles for a nonprofit organization.

Jones develops his fiction entirely within his mind; he wrote only six pages of The Known World in 10 years "and three of those were the final chapter," he says. "I like knowing where a story is going to go before I sit down and start working," he explains. "That’s probably why I do a lot of things in my head. The way the world works, you never know when you might end up one day in a dungeon where there’s no paper available."

There’s one downfall to his method, however: "One of the problems of thinking it through all the way to the end is you second-guess yourself every other day."

Although Jones’ nonlinear storytelling makes his mental gymnastics seem all the more remarkable, for him it’s merely organizational origami. "I always thought that you try to kind of ball it up and not have it all in one straight line," he says. "You just had to pluck out the numbers and if you line the numbers up sequentially, you would come out with a linear story. It just so happens that I take those numbers, one through 10, and sort of ball them up there on the page."

Readers won’t find many autobiographical tidbits about Jones in his fiction; he’s saving those for his golden years.

"Although the second stories in both collections ["The First Day" in Lost; "Spanish in the Morning" in All Aunt Hagar’s Children] have a little bit of my own life in both of them, everything else in those collections is all made up. Maybe it’s good that I do that because one day when I have less of a brain, less of an imagination, then I can start using stuff about friends and my own life. But if I start using that stuff up now, once I get to the point where I have less of an imagination, what will I do?"

Jay MacDonald recently moved from Mississippi to Texas.

Somewhere in Edward P. Jones' apartment, mixed in among his collections of American stamps and thimble-sized Japanese netsuke figurines, is a Pulitzer Prize for his 2003 debut novel, The Known World. The Washington, D.C., native moved just north of Georgetown following a book tour…

Sign Up

Stay on top of new releases: Sign up for our newsletter to receive reading recommendations in your favorite genres.

Trending Interviews