bookpagedev

Review by

It’s a cultural institution, a reflection of our national character, a testament to our affection for the absurd. The New Yorker made its publishing debut in 1925 and has been amusing readers ever since. Now, as the revered weekly prepares to celebrate its 80th anniversary, The Complete Cartoons of The New Yorker sure to be the blockbuster book of the holiday season collects 2,004 of the magazine’s comics in one uproarious, outsized treasury. Organized into chapters based on decade and subject matter, the cartoons presented here tackle topics of timeless import like dogs, cars, drinking and politics. The pieces span nearly a century and serve as a record of our cultural evolution, documenting the intellectual shifts, political attitudes and moral trends that marked America’s coming-of-age. As the pages pass, references to Prohibition and the Depression and the scandal of divorce give way to mentions of drugs and yoga, motorcycles and miniskirts. Indeed, one of the many pleasures offered by this nearly inexhaustible book lies in the comparison of eras: James Thurber’s good-natured jibes at humanity, for example, which he produced in the 1930s and ’40s, stand in fascinating contrast to Saul Steinberg’s contemporary, irony-laden offerings. Over the course of the volume, all of the magazine’s classic humorists are represented William Steig, George Booth, Charles Addams, Roz Chast and Gahan Wilson, among countless others all artists who helped define America’s sense of humor with their wit and brevity, with their skill at distilling the human experience into the confines of a cartoon. A roster of beloved New Yorker writers, including Ian Frazier, Roger Angell, John Updike and Lillian Ross, contribute introductory essays to each chapter, providing background and context for the selections. Two complementary CDs contain every single cartoon published in the magazine, from February 21, 1925, to February 23, 2004. That’s 68,647 different reasons to laugh. Truly a grand anthology. Julie Hale is a writer in Austin, Texas.

It's a cultural institution, a reflection of our national character, a testament to our affection for the absurd. The New Yorker made its publishing debut in 1925 and has been amusing readers ever since. Now, as the revered weekly prepares to celebrate its 80th anniversary,…
Review by

The grand Western Alliance that won the Cold War now seems inevitable, but it was a chancy thing indeed in the early days after World War II. As diplomatic historian Robert L. Beisner notes, France and Britain could have rejected cooperation with the hated Germans. France could have turned to the Soviet Union for protection from Germany. Italy could have gone communist. Greece and Turkey could have gone to war. All were real possibilities. The fact that NATO instead became the reality was due in no small measure to the skills of Dean Acheson, President Truman’s secretary of state from 1949 to 1952 and the subject of Beisner’s triumphantly authoritative new biography, Dean Acheson: A Life in the Cold War. Beisner, the author of previous books on 19th-century American diplomacy, focuses in his 800-plus pages on Acheson’s State Department career, though he includes a brief introduction and coda on his earlier and later years. Throughout, he emphasizes Acheson’s close relationship with Truman, the odd but genuine friendship between the cerebral son of the Yale establishment and the feisty Midwestern populist. Acheson believed the Soviet Union would ultimately have to cave before such a military-economic force, and he was right. Along with his integration of Japan into what was then called the Free World, this was Acheson’s most stunning achievement. But Beisner also highlights Acheson’s considerably more checkered record everywhere except Europe. Bored by and scornful of non-European cultures, he saw everything through a European prism, often with flawed results. With the benefit of hindsight, Acheson’s most obvious error was his failure to end support for France in Indochina, a consequence of his focus on wooing French participation in European integration. The policy ultimately led his successors to the Vietnam War. And we are still feeling the fallout of his similar weakness for British colonial intransigence in Iran and Egypt today. Although Beisner contends that Acheson was our best secretary of state, he takes the time to describe and answer the arguments of his critics. The bottom line for Beisner is the nature of Acheson’s enemies. He may not have handled Mao, Gen. Douglas MacArthur, or the McCarthyites terribly well, Beisner says, but it’s unlikely anyone else could have done better. As for the Soviet Union, Beisner agrees with Acheson that attempting serious negotiations with Stalin would have been a dangerous waste of time.

The fact is, Beisner writes, Acheson’s personality was so glaring, it is nearly impossible to imagine his being appointed to high office in our own times.” Beisner’s impressive work convinces his readers that it’s our loss. Anne Bartlett is a journalist in Washington, D.C.

 

The grand Western Alliance that won the Cold War now seems inevitable, but it was a chancy thing indeed in the early days after World War II. As diplomatic historian Robert L. Beisner notes, France and Britain could have rejected cooperation with the hated Germans.…

Review by

Sharing Good Times is Jimmy Carter’s episodic account of how he has managed to fit fun, family and friends into a life that’s been powered by ambition and inclined toward solitude. It’s not been easy or always successful. As befits his systematic, detail-oriented mind, the former president presents his recollections chronologically, beginning with his earliest memories of tagging along behind his beloved father (“my hero”) and concluding with a fishing trip that he, his wife and their friends took earlier this year to Russia’s wild Kamchatka Peninsula.

Something of a loner since he was a boy, Carter admits that he has “struggled to learn [that some experiences] are more deep and lasting sources of pleasure when they are shared with others.” It is not a lesson he was quick to learn, he concedes. Soon after he graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, he married Rosalynn Smith. But even after the young couple begin having children, Carter says his interest in his own career kept him from involving himself in family matters or assuming many domestic responsibilities. “My almost single-minded commitment to my shipboard duties rarely included my wife,” he recalls, “and we seldom took time off for vacations or even overnight or weekend excursions.” The upshot of this “compartmentalized” marriage was that Rosalynn gradually developed a strong sense of independence. She was shattered, then, when Carter announced without so much as alerting her that he was resigning his Navy commission, after 11 years in the service, to take over the family business in Plains, Georgia. “She wept and cajoled,” he says, “but I exerted my dominance as a husband and we closed the door on my naval career and headed back home.” As the children grew older and his wife joined him in handling the business, Carter became more sensitive to the communal aspects of family life and the joys it brought him. There were fishing and camping trips close to home and educational sojourns to Washington, D.C., and Mexico. Competition became the common denominator of all the trips, both then and later. Who would catch the biggest fish? Who would spot the most birds or climb farthest up the mountain? But Carter had not completely rid himself of his lone-wolf tendencies. In 1962, when he decided to run for the Georgia state senate, Rosalynn didn’t find out about it until he was on his way out the door to file the necessary papers. “It is almost incomprehensible now,” he reflects, “but I had never discussed this life-changing decision with her.” However, by the time he was making his successful run for governor in 1970, he had involved virtually every member of his family in the campaign. The same held true five years later when he began his bid for the presidency.

The pressures of the White House caused Carter to savor the company of those close to him even more than he had before. An admitted penny pincher when it came to funding his own family vacations, he was especially smitten by the free luxuries of Camp David. “[A]fter our first visit to Camp David,” he says, “I told my budget director never to inform me what it cost or to suggest that its services be reduced in any way.” Carter’s affectionate descriptions of times spent at the presidential retreat are among the brightest in the book.

Since leaving Washington and establishing the Carter Center in Atlanta, the Carters and their extended family have become inveterate globetrotters. In various configurations, they have scaled Mounts Everest, Fuji and Kilimanjaro (but none all the way); traversed Spain and lingered over its art and architecture; and roamed through the great African game preserves. Experiencing these locales and friends together, Carter assures us, intensified the delight. Even so, he devotes the penultimate chapter to the pleasures of his solitary “hobbies” of writing, painting and woodworking.

Released just in time for the holidays, Carter’s memoir is available in hardcover and in an unabridged audio version read by the former president himself. The one element missing in this richly detailed treatise on family bonding is a real sense of emotional involvement. Carter witnesses, relays and assesses events as a reporter might. Everything’s there but the feeling.

Sharing Good Times is Jimmy Carter's episodic account of how he has managed to fit fun, family and friends into a life that's been powered by ambition and inclined toward solitude. It's not been easy or always successful. As befits his systematic, detail-oriented mind,…
Review by

<b>John Brown’s civil disobedience</b> In a hearing before a special committee of the U.S. Senate in 1860, George Luther Stearns said he believed John Brown to be the representative man of this century, as Washington was of the last. Stearns, a Massachusetts millionaire, had been the principal source of funds and arms for Brown’s failed raid on the U.S. armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, several months before, the avowed purpose of which was to rally slaves to freedom and also to bring about a radical change in the way Americans thought and acted about slavery. In a public lecture shortly after the seriously flawed mission, Henry David Thoreau declared the raid the best news that America has yet heard, because, among other things, it was an idealistic act of civil disobedience that focused attention on an evil American citizens might now be prodded to actively oppose.

The debate about John Brown’s state of mind continues to this day. In historian Evan Carton’s engrossing <b>Patriotic Treason: John Brown and the Soul of America</b>, we follow the life of a man who took his Christian faith and his hatred of slavers seriously enough that he was willing to give up his own life and the lives of others to advance the abolitionist cause. For the Calvinist John Brown, Carton writes, the Old Testament stories were living guides to understanding and conduct in the present. . . . As it was for many black but few white Americans in the 1840s, Christianity for Brown was a liberation theology. Brown believed in both the Golden Rule and the Declaration of Independence; for him they were the same thing.

Carton demonstrates how Brown, virtually alone among nineteenth-century white Americans, was able to develop personal relationships with black people that were sustained, intimate, trusting, and egalitarian. Of particular interest is Brown’s long friendship with Frederick Douglass. Despite the latter’s refusal to be part of Brown’s Harpers Ferry raid, and his advice against it, six months after Brown was hanged, Douglass said, To have been acquainted with John Brown, shared his counsels, enjoyed his confidence, sympathized with the great objects of his life and death, I esteem as among the highest privileges of my life. The John Brown that emerges from these pages is a religious and patriotic revolutionary, a flawed individual, who sees no other way for God’s will to be done than the path he takes. Carton gives us a rich portrait of a man of vision. <i>Roger Bishop is a retired Nashville bookseller and a frequent contributor to BookPage.</i>

<b>John Brown's civil disobedience</b> In a hearing before a special committee of the U.S. Senate in 1860, George Luther Stearns said he believed John Brown to be the representative man of this century, as Washington was of the last. Stearns, a Massachusetts millionaire, had been…

Review by

<b>Mr. Rogers’ gift of friendship</b> In 1995, journalist Tim Madigan made a phone call to interview a well-known television host. At the other end of the line he found an unexpected new friend Fred Rogers, of the celebrated children’s television series Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood. <b>I’m Proud of You</b> is Madigan’s account of that friendship, which lasted until Rogers’ death in 2003. During those eight years the two men corresponded through letters, e-mail, phone calls and visits, many of which Madigan references in the book.

The title of the book comes from the end of every message Rogers sent to Tim: IPOY I’m Proud of You. This gentle blessing came to Madigan during a time when he could not reconcile his own drive for success with the feelings of despair that troubled his soul. The simple refrain continued long afterward, a quiet promise of acceptance and encouragement as from a father to a beloved son. The older man’s support guided Madigan through battles with depression, troubles in marriage and the death of his younger brother, Steve, at the age of 41.

<b>I’m Proud of You</b> is a beautiful book, a wonderful and moving tribute to life, friendship and love. Through Madigan’s eyes and experiences, readers will see how one man’s gentle spirit and compassion sparked a flow of love that continued far beyond his reach. Together Rogers and Madigan shared pain and healing, sorrow and joy, in a friendship that Rogers always insisted was as much a blessing to him as to Madigan. Their prayers and mutual faith Rogers as a Presbyterian minister and Madigan as a lifelong Catholic helped them find the grace in every moment, whether joyful or tragic. In the end, Madigan’s book is a reminder that true joy is not found in the accomplishments of the human mind, but in the love God puts in the human heart. For fans of Mr. Rogers or those seeking a quiet, uplifting read, <b>I’m Proud of You</b> is an absolute treasure. <i>Howard Shirley is a writer in Franklin, Tennessee.</i>

<b>Mr. Rogers' gift of friendship</b> In 1995, journalist Tim Madigan made a phone call to interview a well-known television host. At the other end of the line he found an unexpected new friend Fred Rogers, of the celebrated children's television series Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood. <b>I'm…

Review by

When a young Muslim of Moroccan descent slaughtered Theo van Gogh in 2004 as punishment for the Dutch filmmaker’s perceived offenses against Islam, it propelled the people of Holland into a state of national soul-searching. How could such a tolerant and generous society could spark such lethal and self-righteous rage? In Murder in Amsterdam, Ian Buruma, a native of the Netherlands who teaches at Bard College, attempts to answer this question, first of all by de-mythologizing both the victim and the killer.

For all his acknowledged talents, van Gogh was a monstrously annoying figure, even to his friends: uncouth, quick to insult and uncanny in pricking his adversary’s soft spots. Mohammed Bouyeri, despite his contempt for all things Western, wore Nike sneakers under his black jellaba at his murder trial and had a history of getting high on hashish and flirting with Dutch girls.

Buruma speculates that Holland’s zeal for multiculturalism which nurtured the rise of militant Islam within its borders was, in part, a reaction to the country’s shameful failure to protect its Jewish citizens against the Nazis during World War II. Welcoming and supporting immigrants became a way of lessening this stain. But the European model of welfare, which demands little from its recipients, ensures neither contentment nor gratitude, Buruma argues. Immigrants appear to fare better in the harsher system of the United States, where there is less temptation to milk the state. The necessity to fend for oneself encourages a kind of rough integration. Rather than using van Gogh’s murder as an occasion to pillory Dutch tolerance or radical Muslim intolerance, Buruma probes the psychological world of unassimilated outsiders who are caught between a homeland that couldn’t sustain them and a new one that can’t fully embrace them. What happened in Holland, he concludes, could happen anywhere as long as men and women feel that death is their only way home. Edward Morris is a writer in Nashville.

When a young Muslim of Moroccan descent slaughtered Theo van Gogh in 2004 as punishment for the Dutch filmmaker's perceived offenses against Islam, it propelled the people of Holland into a state of national soul-searching. How could such a tolerant and generous society could spark…
Review by

In his new book, The Discomfort Zone: A Personal History, acclaimed novelist Jonathan Franzen looks back at his childhood and adolescence near Chicago in the 1960s and ’70s. I grew up in the middle of the country in the middle of the golden age of the American middle class, he writes.

A brilliantly talented author, Franzen is more aware than most Americans of the ironies of individuality and citizenship. There are many moments here that bring together the individual and group experience of being American, from Franzen’s brother and father fighting over the National Guard shootings at Kent State to the mix of compassion and annoyance experienced by those beseeched for donations in the days following Hurricane Katrina.

Winner of the National Book Award in 2001 for The Corrections, Franzen is perhaps best known for his own discomfort about taking part in Oprah’s TV book club. In his memoir, Franzen’s story moves between his adult life as a relatively famous novelist and his childhood as a nerdy and insecure child and teen. The Discomfort Zone provides page after page of clear-eyed observation and disconcertingly candid emotion. Many readers will identify with the ongoing argument between Franzen’s father and mother over where to set the thermostat in their house, a struggle that gives the book its title.

Sometimes Franzen seems to be galloping off on a tangent, but readers who stay with him will find that he has kept his topic in mind all along. For example, in exploring what he admired about Charles Schulz’s Peanuts comic strip, he examines Schulz’s life and the curious way that his cartoons appealed to both squares and hippies in the 1960s. By the time Franzen gets to the kitsch and sentimentality of later Peanuts strips, he has analyzed an era and his own parents. By the time he reaches the end of this book, he has immortalized a country and a family blithely unaware of their own decline.

Michael Sims is the editor of
The Annotated Archy and Mehitabel.

 

In his new book, The Discomfort Zone: A Personal History, acclaimed novelist Jonathan Franzen looks back at his childhood and adolescence near Chicago in the 1960s and '70s. I grew up in the middle of the country in the middle of the golden age…

Review by

The pictures are burned into our collective brains, and the facts are familiar to people all over the world. But five years after 9/11, many of us still want to know: How did those spouses cope? How would I manage if faced with such overwhelming tragedy? The story of how four 9/11 widows coped and healed and found love again is told in Love You, Mean It: A True Story of Love, Loss, and Friendship. Patricia Carrington, Julia Collins, Claudia Gerbasi and Ann Haynes were vibrant young women, almost all of them newlyweds, when their loved ones left for work one September day and never came back. Their shared memoir traces their storybook courtships and marriages, how their lives were wrenched apart after the attack and how fate brought them together as The Widow’s Club based on true understanding and the gruesome bond they share. We’ve learned that life isn’t always easy or predictable or fair, the women write.

As they rebuild lives now vulnerable to horror, and sink into routines where his side of the bed doesn’t exist, they drown their tears together in New York restaurants and bars and heal each other through constant calls and e-mail (the book’s title is taken from a favorite way to sign off). They also take trips to the beach and foreign places where any and all emotions can surface (a trip to the island where Julia eloped with her husband nearly proves too much) and attend yearly memorials at Ground Zero.

It’s impossible to truly understand another’s sorrow, but Love You, Mean It manages to demonstrate the massive personal devastation of the 9/11 attack, and as the women begin to date and even marry again ( Maybe it was ungrateful to pray for more than the enormous amount we’d already been given, they write), the generosity and resiliency of the human heart. Deanna Larson writes from Nashville.

The pictures are burned into our collective brains, and the facts are familiar to people all over the world. But five years after 9/11, many of us still want to know: How did those spouses cope? How would I manage if faced with such overwhelming…
Review by

Some might wince at the idea of a comic book treatment of the September 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Center. But consider the history of the medium: Some of the most brilliant graphic novels ever created have covered horror and tragedy (Art Spiegelman’s Maus on the Holocaust, Joe Sacco’s Palestine and Safe Area Gorazde, just to name a few). In their graphic adaptation of the final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, The 9/11 Report: A Graphic Adaptation (also available in hardcover), comics veterans Sid Jacobson and Ernie Colon take advantage of the medium to create a multi-frame timeline laying out the events of that day as they happened simultaneously in different places. The effect is a coherent, if often brutal, picture of the September 11 attacks that will surely have a stronger and wider impact on readers than any governmental report possibly could.

Some might wince at the idea of a comic book treatment of the September 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Center. But consider the history of the medium: Some of the most brilliant graphic novels ever created have covered horror and tragedy (Art Spiegelman's…
Review by

Peter Straub’s page-turner, In the Night Room (Random House, $21.95, 352 pages, ISBN 1400062527), is a fascinating jumble of fantasy and reality that follows his previous novel, lost boy, lost girl. Here, Straub introduces readers to Tim Underhill, a New York-based thriller writer about to go on tour to promote his latest book, lost boy, lost girl. Willy Patrick, a New York-based children’s book writer, has just won the Newbery Medal for her book In the Night Room. While it may sound complicated, Straub’s writing is so clean and clear the reader will have no difficulty following his intricate path. Underhill wrote his book following the murder of his nephew; Willy wrote her book as a survivor’s response to the murder of her husband and daughter. Underhill’s work, in particular, has complicated and far-reaching consequences. The ghost of his sister, April, murdered 40 years before, appears and commands him to “Listen.” Then he begins receiving e-mails from the recently dead. A deranged fan accosts him in a diner and harangues him for failing to write his “real” books. And an angry angel appears to him. Thankfully, there are a couple of signs of hope: the child who has grown up and stepped outside a repetitive cycle of abuse to become a pediatrician, and Underhill’s cold and boring brother whose fiancŽe has brought him to new and unexpected life.

In the Night Room is a pleasure to read. The details, such as how characters sustain themselves when taken out of context, are wonderful, and the ending leaves the reader satisfied and hopeful that there will be more from Tim Underhill and Peter Straub in the near future.

Peter Straub's page-turner, In the Night Room (Random House, $21.95, 352 pages, ISBN 1400062527), is a fascinating jumble of fantasy and reality that follows his previous novel, lost boy, lost girl. Here, Straub introduces readers to Tim Underhill, a New York-based thriller writer about to…
Review by

In Mappa Mundi, the latest science ficiton novel by British writer Justina Robson to be published in the U.S., the author offers an engaging pyrotechnic slice of a near future in which computer software for humans is the next big research front.

Robson begins with six short legends, tantalizing childhood stories of the main characters with subtle hints of the action to come. At the center of the story is Natalie Armstrong, a psychologist, computer scientist and daughter of one of the most famous men in computing. All her life she has fought for control of herself, her world and her future. Natalie’s tenuous link to reality broke when her mother died and she spent a couple of years in a mental facility. She has often felt that she is fighting her father and now suspects they are working on different aspects of the same brain mapping project, Mappa Mundi. Natalie slowly comes to see her father’s sacrifices and recognizes that his project goals, though grand in scope, originated in his desire to help her maintain her mental balance.

Another legend, Mikhail Guskov, has been funding the project, but he has also been working on it from other angles, including a collaboration with a beautiful but psychopathic CIA officer. When Natalie is contacted in an unconventional way by another CIA agent, she realizes her small research project has attracted some very powerful players. Even when an experiment goes wrong and seems to kill a test subject, it does not stop government interest in using the Mappa Mundi project to control people.

The novel is set in the English city of York, in Washington, D.C., and on a reservation in Montana, and each place is economically portrayed with a few spare touches. Robson delves into how the aphrodisiac of power can affect individual and social identities. She is a romantic, but the stakes here are high and she pulls no punches. Gavin J. Grant is the co-editor of The Year’s Best Fantasy &andamp; Horror: 2006 (St. Martin’s).

In Mappa Mundi, the latest science ficiton novel by British writer Justina Robson to be published in the U.S., the author offers an engaging pyrotechnic slice of a near future in which computer software for humans is the next big research front.

Robson…
Review by

In Forgetfulness, his 15th novel in a distinguished career as both a journalist and fiction writer, Ward Just offers a heartbreaking tale that is as contemporary as today’s newspaper headlines and as timeless as the most profound classic tragedy. Just’s admirers will welcome this latest addition to an impressive, if underappreciated, body of work, and new readers will undoubtedly be inspired to seek out more of his writing.

Thomas Railles is a respected American painter, enjoying an idyllic life in the south of France with his wife Florette, a native of their small village. He produces portraits displayed in museums and galleries around the world, frequents the local cafŽ, and plays billiards with his neighbor, St. John Granger, an enigmatic veteran of World War I. Railles’ placid existence is shattered when, one autumn afternoon, Florette is seriously injured while hiking alone in the nearby mountains. Four Moroccan terrorists traversing the region start to rescue her on an improvised stretcher, but when it becomes clear they cannot save her life without risking exposure, they kill her.

In crisp, unadorned prose, Just focuses on Railles’ struggle with his grief, while patiently peeling back the benign veneer of the painter’s life to reveal his occasional undercover jobs for two boyhood friends, career CIA agents. Railles must confront the fact that in at least one instance that work what he casually refers to as a lark may have resulted in the death of a man. Those same friends vow to track down Florette’s killers to enable Railles to exact revenge. Soon, they do that and Railles is brought face-to-face with the killers in a claustrophobic interrogation room. The scene in which he confronts Yussef, the quartet’s leader, is painted with heart-stopping brilliance.

The world Ward Just has created in Forgetfulness is a chilly place, where actions have consequences and moral debts must be repaid. Yet that same world is one in which human beings are free to make choices that ultimately will define their lives. Readers who like their fiction full of serious questions will find this a mature and deeply satisfying work.

In Forgetfulness, his 15th novel in a distinguished career as both a journalist and fiction writer, Ward Just offers a heartbreaking tale that is as contemporary as today's newspaper headlines and as timeless as the most profound classic tragedy. Just's admirers will welcome this…
Review by

In Tattoo for a Slave, 92-year-old novelist Hortense Calisher (A Sunday Jew) renders a personalized history of the last 100 years of the United States. Hailed as a mixture of fiction and autobiography, Calisher’s memoir tells the story of her Southern, Jewish, slave-owning family, beginning with her father’s birth in 1861.

Language, with its potential to be playful, evocative, elusive, nuanced and shocking, is the real star of the book. Calisher’s style has appropriately been compared to that of Vladimir Nabokov; some may also find it reminiscent of John Barth. Calisher hopscotches between memories and related incidents, creating a rich tapestry rather than a driving narrative. The three characters that emerge most vividly are her immigrant mother, her business-tycoon father and her self-engrossed brother. They are distinct individuals, but suggest different facets of the American experience.

Calisher’s mother, Hedwig, represents the survivalism of immigrants: she is unsentimental, opportunistic and contemptuous of the new world in which she finds herself. Calisher’s father, Joe, is the clear hero of the book. Pressured to support a sprawling family, he subordinates his artistic, intellectual interests to become successful in the perfume industry, evincing the classic American tension between culture and commerce. Her brother emerges perhaps the most vividly. He appears to have inherited only the greed and self-absorption of his mother and father with none of their redeeming characteristics. His character points cautiously to the end result of America’s relentless quest for money and personal ease.

Perhaps the most intriguing thing about Calisher’s portrait of her family and her country is the apparent distance she keeps from her own motherland. She often refers ironically to Amerika, spelled as German immigrants spelled it as if she were describing it from the point of view of a foreigner, rather than someone born in Richmond, Virginia. Lynn Hamilton writes from Tybee Island, Georgia.

In Tattoo for a Slave, 92-year-old novelist Hortense Calisher (A Sunday Jew) renders a personalized history of the last 100 years of the United States. Hailed as a mixture of fiction and autobiography, Calisher's memoir tells the story of her Southern, Jewish, slave-owning family, beginning…

Sign Up

Stay on top of new releases: Sign up for our newsletter to receive reading recommendations in your favorite genres.

Trending Features